 |
| The History Photo of West Papua on December 1th 1961 in Manokwari, Papua |
PART ONE
General Backgrounds
A.
The discovery of the island of Papua and Given Name
Why the Melanesians people of West Papua still struggle for their political rights to self determination?
Because there was
have a history of the Islands of West New Guinea Netherland and also the
indigenous people of West Papuan was live as long in the Island from century to
century on human lives.
For more details, we
invite you could learn all the historical material we put together in the article about the Hostorical Flashback of West Papua on the next page. Please to learning!!!
According to ancient history, in times of empire, that Papua was
visited by Chinese traders in the 14th century, and named the island
of Papua with the name of TUNG-KI or Janggi. Then, Papua has been introduced by
Chinese traders to the kingdom of Srivijaya in Sumatra, Indonesia in the 13th
century and the kingdom of Majapahit in East Java, Indonesia in the 14th
century.
Historically ANCIENT that Papua has also been recorded in the Book
of the Kertagama, under the suzerainty of Majapahit in 1365, when King MPU
Prapanca establish trade channels and can provide two parts of the Papuans,
namely, Onin and Seran with a view to easier control of Java. Besides, the
first Islamic kingdom was established in Waigama Misol Islands in 1350, as
trade with the Arabs. (The relationship is not fixed and limited).
Furthermore, in 1511 Papua has been visited by Antonio 'de Abreu,
and named the island of Papua with the name' Ilha de Papoia '. Followed by
Radriguez in 1517.
Furthermore, in 1521 Antonio Pigafetta a World Record on Megallan's
Epic World or a winner navigator sea on long journeys has received information
of Papua, in addition to containing spices in Ternate that there was a king
whose name KING OF PAPUA, very strong and rich with gold and live in the
island.
Subsequently, on June 20th in 1545 the island of New
Guinea in the visit by "Ynigo Ordize de Retes," a sailor Spaniard on,
as he circled the globe while looking for spices, of eclectus into Mexico
through the Pacific and stopped in estuary of the river of Mamberamo and named
it Nova Guinea.
After Ynigo back to Europe, he maked a report on its findings. Then
the scientists enter into the world maps, and given the name of the island of
Papua New Guinea became in 1569.
The name is based on the findings Ynigo, on the physical
characteristics and clumps of Papuan nation is same in common with the people
in Guinea, Africa continent. Resource: Encylopaedie van Nederlandsch Indie (On
Papua).
Furthermore, this name again plotted in the maps of the World into
two parts, according to the division of the two colony area, namely the
Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Then after the Dutch began to master Papua
from 1908, the name of West Papua be plotted again “West New Guinea Nederlands” in the western part of the island
(under the rule of the Netherlands) and
Eastern part of the island is “Papua New
Guinea” (under the British rule).
The name lasted until 1963, where the Dutch has been to leaved West
Papua and Indonesian began occupying in the Land of Papua nation through by the
massive MILITARY
INVASION, with the earth-scorching the environment of indigenous
people and killing and eliminate forced the lives of indigenous people of the
nation of Papua , which in fact violate the Human Rights of the Nation in the
western part of the island of Papua New Guinea.
Furthermore, the political relationship with the Sultan of Tidore
official in 1649 at the time of the VOC (Dutch Indies Company) above sea
division Tidore. To dispel VOC, Sultan Jamaluddin asked you for help to Mambri
Kurabesi. Kurabesi is a famous war leader of Waigeo island, Papua.
Kurabesi departed with 24 vessels of war, under his command and
repulsed the VOC. For the assistance of Mambri Kurabesi, then as a tribute,
Sultan Jamaludin has given his daughter named Bongky inbred with Mambri
Kurabesi.
From the results of this marriage Papuans of Waigeo and King four
lots settled in Morotai and mating marriage to this day. This relationship is
limited and inconclusive on the land of Papua.
Subsequently, on August 24th, 1828, the Dutch government
has proclaimed that Papua is a colony of its territory, and began to build a
trading post in Manokwari. Name of the post is "Fort du Bus". With
Likewise, there is no relationship with Indonesian. Papua is Indonesia's claim
to victimization. Why? Because the historical facts are not proven. What is
intended is: Inscription Relations Indonesian Through the spread of Islam,
which is always a flaming-waged Indonesian, there is absolutely no
justification.
From the findings of the experts of scientists the world over, it
gave full support that Papua is Papua who have never touched by any man in the
world, before Ynigo Ordiz de Retes and Germman missionaries (Ottow and Geisler)
came on the ground of Papuans on 5th February in 1855.
To learn more, please read the history books of the Papua which has
been to recorded by the true Papuans intellectuals and the book of Prof. Pieter J. Drooglever titled "West Papua An Act of Free Choice". 1
 |
| Globe Map of World |
B.
The arrival of European Missionaries in West
Papua
On 5th February 1855, two German Missionaries, (Ottow and
Geissler) set foot on the island of Mansinam, Manokwari, Papua, and is
committed to serve the people of God's work in Papua. Ottow and Geissler, has
conducted evangelistic mission in Papua from 1855 until 1894 (39 years old).
Then they closed the mission stations in Papua because the Dutch
have mastered the trade in Papua. And the gospel of Christ is continued by
Native Papuans, who have received the gospel of Christ as Savior today.
Facts prove that the famous West Papua is full of mystery and human
well-known like war, living under tribals confederation that has been able to conquests by the Gospel of Christ.
West Papua is a land blessed by the Creator of heaven and earth
creator of universe and everything in it. God created West Papua and Papua made
man in His image and likeness (Exodus 28 :). Then only Evangelism Mission to
humanize the Papuans, because the Lord had foretold his.
Prophecy God is "God Speaking that preach the gospel of Christ
to the world, to the ends of the earth". On the basis of God's Word, the
Gospel of Christ has succeeded conquest West Papua.
Pad dated May 16th, 1895 the Government of the Kingdom of
the Netherlands and the UK Government has divided the island of Papua into two
parts, with the line (Lat. 141o 1 '47 "), in Gravenhagen-Netherlands. The
division is by giving the responsibility of each to the two countries which, in
the western part of the island of New Guinea to the Government of the Netherlands
and in the eastern part of the island of New Guinea to the Australian
Government. 2
Photo of
European Missionary
 |
| The photo of European Christian Missionary Precent in West Papua in 1855 to 1060 (Wisel Meren Region) |
C.
Dutch presenced in West Papua
After the German Missionary Service (Ottow and Geissler), the
Netherlands has build expansion of trading posts in
Papua. Thus the Dutch completely controlled the western part of the island of
New Guinea.
In 1898 the Dutch Parliament divide West Papua, which is under the
control jurisdiction of Maluca Garesidenan district
into two parts with the renamed into North New Guinea (North Coast) and South
New Guinea (West & South Coast).
Trading post that has been opened in Manokwari in 1894 can be
changed into government posts in 1901 for the department of North New Guinea,
on the other post Fakfak Updeling New Guinea to the South.
In 1902, New Guinea in the South again divided into two parts,
namely, Updeling West New Guinea (Fakfak), Updeling New Guinea and the South
(Merauke). Because Dutch divide West Papua so, then the Tidore Rights demanded
payment of compensation to the Sultan of Tidore worth f 6,000.
In 1903, the Dutch government has started to colonize the West Papua
region. First, through the delivery of the Javanese people to Merauke to settle
there. In 1904, the Dutch have been in contact with the territorial relations
in West Papua research and concluded that the relationship between the Sultan
of Tidore and West Papua are merely theoretical, (H. Colijn, 1907: 13).
 |
| Dutch presenced in West Papua in 1909 to 1963 |
Hollandia
(now Jayapura) which has become the most important in World War II, has been
split into Sub District (Sub Afdeling) North New Guinea (Manokwari). Following
the issue of the Communist Party of Indonesia in Java and Sumatra in the year
1926/1927, the Dutch of complication
1308 with 823 families have been in jailed and had been
sent by the governor de Groeff to Camp, Digoel in Tanah Merah Prison near
Merauke, West Papua.
On 28th October 1928, in Batavia Youth Organizations of
Indonesia has been able to do an agreement called "Indonesian Youth Pledge". In the Indonesian Youth
Pledge, which includes Indonesia are: Jong Java,
Jong Sumatra, Jong Celebes,
Jong Ambon and other islands. Papua is not included in the
Indonesian Youth Pledge, then the automatic in separate Papua from
Indonesia or not Indonesia. This fact proves that Papuans have no connection at
all with the people of Indonesian.
In 1931, the Dutch started oil exploration in West Papua. In the
same year, in a report by the Royal Dutch representative to the Moluccas shown to the
Government in Batavia (now Jakarta) and B.J. Hoga that the indigenous people of
West Papua was not part of TIDORE, and confirmation to representatives of the Kingdom of
the Netherlands in Malucas that only Raja Ampat, Onim and Kaimana (J.M.J,
Brantjes, 195: 26). Thus, the claim Tidore over West Papua is not proven.
In 1935, the Japanese government began to conduct intelligence
activities in the pre-World War II in West Papua, through the agency of
commercial enterprises. Company names mentioned are "Nanyo Kahatsu
Kabushiki Koisha" in Manokwari.
On March 9th, 1942, West Papua has been at the invasion
and Japanese nutmeg Army act to started World War II in this territory. Japan has did occupation for
two years in West Papua.
On 30th July 1944, the Allied Forces under the command of
Gen. MacArthur attacked Japanese nutmeg soldiers with strength in Sausapor, Werur,
Amsterdam and Middleburg Island and ending the occupation of West Papua, one
year before the Indonesian people proclaimed their Independence.
Following the surrender of Japan, Administration Cipil in Papua with
the immediate transfer of control to the Netherlands Indies Civil
Administration (NICA) by the Allies. In conclusion, American forces led by
MacArthur has helped its allies (the Netherlands). Japan and the United States
in Papua as stopover Japan post, in
order faces World War II.
Papua is pure Dutch colony as it can be studied in the books of history are
correct, but the version history of Indonesian is engineered with a full
history of manipulation, which can eliminate the truth of historical facts.
Remember, truth never in defeat by human artifice, but the truth is
always expressed in human life. Thus, the manipulations, engineerings of the
oppressors in West Papua will be revealed in due course, in accordance Lord create calendar and make Papua people.3
 |
|
The Dutch in West Papua been Educating
indigenous people of Papua but Indonesian
entered in Papua to kill indigenous
people of Papua (photo Dutch in West Papua 1900 to 1963)
|
PART TWO
Law Based of the International Intervention on West Papua
A. The United Nations Organization
 |
|
Photo of United Nations in West Papua 1962 to 1969
|
On
April 25th, 1945, the Conference opened at San Francisco. More than
200 delegates from 50 nations assembled at the War Memorial Opera House, with
the US Secretary of State, Settinius in
the chair. After two months of labor, The Charter Of the United Nations was
completed. It was to come into force when ratified by the United States, Great
Britain, Russia, France, and China. On June 26th, 1945, President
Truman made the closing speech in San Francisco, and sent the Charter to the
Senate on at once. On July 28th, 1945, the Senate ratified the
Charter with decisive vote of 89 to 2. One of the purposes fo the UN is
"to develop friendly relations Among nations based on respect for the
principle based on EQUAL RIGHTS and SELF-determination, ' as specifically
stipulated in Article 73 (a) and (b) of the Charter.
Explanation:
In International Conference in San Francisco on April 25th,
1945, which was attended by 200 delegates from 50 countries have made
statements and complements the Agency Organization of the United Nations. There
has been giving special authority to the five Member States of the United
Nations, as holder of Veto right. Countries included are: United States, United
Kingdom, Russia, France and China.
On June 26th, 1945, President Truman made a closed
conference in San Francisco, and send the results of the statement that has
been set on 25th April 1945 over the United States Senate once.
On July 28th, 1945, the US Senate has ratified this
statement with 89 votes. One understanding that the United Nations in building
a base of friendly relations between the United Nations with respect to
fundamental principles on the Rights of the same and Self-Determination,
especially special conditions of the State under article 73 (a) and (b) in this
statement.
This section is the foundation of the Positive Law for the
protection of Human Rights in the face of the earth, which is the
responsibility of individuals and private institutions and particularly in the
State Government.
Based on this decision, the respect for pluralism and the rule of
the Right of Human Rights can become a serious concern and each person individually
and private organizations and the government in each State shall implement
instruments of human rights, in order to provide protection for the Rights of
each person. 4
B. United Nations decolonization program
As a realization of Article 73 (a) and (b) of the Charter, upon the
UN General Assembly's request, a colonial territorial assessment was Carried
out in 1946 by eight states (Australia, Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, New
Zealand, UK and the USA). Based on the assessment 72 (seventy two) colonies
throughout the world were Formally declared by the United Nations as 'NON
SELF-governing TERRITORIES,' Including West Papua, the which had to be
DE-COLONIZE. As a result, the UNGA Adopted Resolution 66 (1) of December 14th,
1946, containing a de-colonization list. Based on the above resolution,
immediate preparatory steps toward independence of the colonies were taken by
the colonizing states under the control of the United Nations. A number of UNGA
Resolutions Adopted in this regard were respectively afterwards.
In the South Pacific region, conducted in Canberra in 1947. The
South Pacific Commission. The SPC was Initially Aimed to establish and
Strengthen international cooperation in promoting the advancement of the
well-being of the peoples in the South Pacific Islands in general preparation
toward eventual self-determination, in line with the UN decolonization program.
Explanation:
Dealing with article 73 (a) and (b) in the Conference on 25 April
1945, the UN General Assembly asked to the States in order to leave the
territory Colonial in 1946. Demand is especially the UN General Assembly to 8
UN member States such as, " (Australia, Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands,
New Zealand, UK and the USA) "to become a judge and an example for other
Colonial Countries. Seventy-two (72) colony had to get out of colonization and
granted full independence, according the UN Declaration on ungoverned
territories, including West Papua, which is still in de-colonization. It is the
result of the adoption of resolution 66 (1) of the UN General Assembly (UNGA),
dated December 14th, 1946 based on the United Nations list of de-colonization.
Based on the UN General Assembly resolution on the above, the Dutch
government has been able to carry out the preparation of the State of Papua.
This is to be proven on the inaugural ceremony, shared between the Dutch
Government and the representatives of the Papuan people who live in the western
part of the island of New Guinea on December 1th, 1961.
More will be explained in section VII and VIII, therefore, readers
are given the opportunity to tune in and can learn it carefully.5
C. Declaration on the Granting of Independence to the Colonials Territories and Peoples. A / RES / 1514 (XV) of December 14th, 1960
The General Assembly
Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world
the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human
rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of
men and women, and of nations large and small and to promote social programs
and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Conscious of the need for the need for the creation of conditions of
stability and well-being and peaceful and friendly relations based on respect
for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of all peoples. and of
universal respect for, and Observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms
for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
Recognizing the passionate yearning for freedom in all dependent
peoples and the decisive role of such peoples in the attainment of Reviews
their independence, Aware of the increasing conflicts in the resulting from the
denial of or impediments in the way of the freedom of such peoples, the which
constitute a serious threat to world peace, Considering the important role of
the United Nations in assisting the movement for independence in Trust and
Non-Self-Governing Territories,
Recognizing that the people of the world ardently desire the end of
colonialism in all its manifestations,
Convinced that the continued existence of colonialism Prevent the
development of international economic cooperation, impedes the social, cultural
and economic development of dependent peoples and militates against the United
Nations ideal of universal peace,
Affirming that people may, for Reviews their own ends, freely
dispose of Reviews their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any
obligations Arising out of international economic cooperation, based upon the
principle of mutual benefit and international law,
Believing the emergence in recent years of a large number of
dependent territories into freedom and independence, and recognizing the
Increasingly powerful trends towards freedom in such territories the which have
not yet attained independence,
Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete
freedom, the exercise of Reviews their sovereignty and the integrity of Reviews
their national territory,
Solemnly proclaims the necessity of bringing to a speedy and
unconditional end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations,
And this to end,
Declares that:
The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and
exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is Contrary to
the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of
world peace and cooperation.
All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue that
right they freely Determine Reviews their political status and freely pursue
Reviews their economic, social and cultural development.
Inadequacy of political, economic, and social or educational
preparedness should NEVER serve as pretext for Delaying independence.
All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed
against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise
peacefully and freely Reviews their right to complete independence, and the
integrity of Reviews their national territory shall be respected.
Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing
Territories or all other territories the which have not yet attained
independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of Reviews those
territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with Reviews
their freely Expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race,
creed or color, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and
freedom.
Any attempt Aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national
unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the
purposes and principle of the United Nations.
All states shall Observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of
the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and the present Declaration on the basis of equality, non-interference in the
internal affairs of all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of all
peoples and their territorial integrity.
Explanation:
By its resolution A / RES / 1514 (XV) United Nations General
Assembly on 14th December 1960 in the above, the Dutch Government is
obliged and responsible for the Right to Self-Determination for the Papua
People who live in the western part of the island of New Guinea. In this case,
the Netherlands intends either to give full independence for the nation of
Papua, in the western part of the island of New Guinea, but the Dutch
government's good intentions have been thwarted by the interests of US
imperialism and Indonesia.
The description in English is very solid and clear, then the reader
is given an opportunity to be studied carefully and effectively. 6
D. West Papua on Decolonization
Human Resources Preparation:
In Resolution 845 (IX) of 22th November 1954, the General Assembly invited
Member States to extend generously to the inhabitants of Non-Self-Governing
Territories Reviews their offers of facilities, not only for study and training
of university standard, but in the first place , for study at the post-primary
level as well as technical and vocational training of immediate practical
value.
After noting the observations of the UN Committee on Information,
the General Assembly Adopted Resolution 1967 (XVI) on 19 December 1961. In this
resolution the General Assembly Considered that the light of the decolonization
on the Granting of Independence to Colonials Countries and Peoples, continued
in its Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14rd December 1960, IMMEDIATE STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN
TO TRANSFER ALL POWERS TO THE PEOPLES OF THE NON-SELF-GOVERNING
TERRITORIES WITHOUT ANY CONDITIONS OR RESERVATION, and
that the rapid preparation and training of indigenous personnel would help
towards the achievement of the purposes of Resolution 1514 (XV).
Territorial Government:
Days before sovereignty recognition by the Dutch government on
Indonesia in 1949, West Papua, known as Netherlands New Guinea was affirmed in
1950 as a special autonomy government, headed by a governor based on the
Netherlands Government's Official Gazette J.576, of December 22th, 1949.
In the light of Resolution 1514 (XV) and other related resolutions,
West Papua's independence Immediately underwent its preparatory stages.
Long before the adoption of Resolution 1514 (XV), the Netherlands
government issued an Official Gazette, Stattsblad J.599, January 10rd, 1949, for the
establishment of a West Papuan Council, consisted of a number of peoples'
representatives, that would function as a legislative body. However, special
considerations due to the plan was only brought into realization on April 5rd, 1961.
Based on NNG Govt. Official Gazette No. 6B 1961 (National Flag),
1961 No. 69 (National Anthem), and No.
70 1961 (Flag Raising) of November 18rd, 1961, the West Papuan National Attributes were
Officially Announced, and used Effectively on December 01rd, 1961.
The Dutch Government action to free West Papua infuriated Soekarno.
On December 19rd, 1961, Sukarno in a political rally in Yogyakarta declared his
national command, commonly know as the 'Triple Command of the People' to annex
West Papua.
Joseph Luns Connection
Joseph Luns, the Dutch Foreign Minister deliberately misled the
Dutch parliament in the 1950s by informing them that he had secured an
agreement with US Secretary of State, John F. Dulles, guaranteeing US support
for Holland in the event of armed conflict over the West Papua dispute (as was
admitted when interviewed by Dr. Paulgrain in 1981 in Brussels).
During the negotiations in 1962 that led to the government, Luns' instructions
to the Dutch representative, van Royen, were so counterproductive in helping to
ATTAIN self-determination for the Papuans that van Royen refused to speak with
LUNs ever again.
With Bunker as mediator, the talks were an unending retreat by the Dutch
from their initial standpoint. Kennedies Connection page revision: 0, last
edited: 27rd Sep 2009, 01:16 GMT + 0900 (880 days ago).
Explanation:
a. Human Resources Preparation
(Preparation of Human Resources)
Pursuant to resolution 845 (IX) on 22rd November
1954 United Nations General Assembly invited Member States of the United
Nations and ask respectfully give full attention to the population in areas of
non-self Governing in order to take over, by providing facilities, not only for
learning and traning at the University standard, but the first place, to learn
on the main level that better technique and vocational training on the
practical value immediately.
Having noted the above observations, the information committee of
the UN, the UN General Assembly has adopted Resolution 1967 (XVI) on 19rd December 1961.
In this resolution the UN General Assembly to concentrate that light up
Decolonization and grant of independence to colonial Territories and its people,
continues in resolution 1514 (XV) on December 14rd, 1960, immediately take
the steps necessary to transfer all powers to the people in areas that are
non-self governing without conditions or reservations, and that sooner preparation and traning on indigenous personnel or those
indigenous people can help them towards the achievement of appropriate
Resolution 1514 (XV).
The UN General Assembly determined the
Member States of the United Nations, that shall implement all the decisions and
determination through the Declarations or the International Covenants and the
International Conventions;
This includes the Right to Self-Determination, as can be explained
according to the resolution 1514 (XV) of the UN General Assembly on the
de-Colonization, also have been assigned to the International Covenant on the
Rights of Civil and Political in Article 1 Paragraph 1, 2, and Paragraph 3 ,
which has been agreed upon in the UN General Assembly on December 16rd, 1966 and again
reaffirmed the UN Declaration of Indigenous
Peoples on September 13rd, 2007, in article 3 and article 4;
All the Basic Law on Human Rights which has can be described at
points or parts II points A, B, C, & Dabove, the people of West Papua on
the island of New Guinea has the Right to Self-Determination. This right has
not bee done appropriate as UN mechanism on conflict settlement or region
without governing Colonies, the Right to
Self-Determination itself for Papuan People would still be valid.
b. Territorial Government (Regional
Government)
The days prior to the introduction or the recognition of sovereignty
over Indonesia by the Dutch government in 1949, West Papua New Guinea is known
to the Netherlands, had declared in 1950 became a special autonomous
government, headed by a governor who is based J.576 Netherlands Government Official
Gazette, on December 22rd, 1949.
In the spirit of Resolution 1514 (XV) and linked with other
resolutions, then immediately prepare steps independence of West Papua.
With the adoption Resolution 1514 (XV), the Government of the
Netherlands issued an Official Gazette, Stattsblad J.599, on 10 January 1949,
to establish the Council of West Papua, as representatives of the people, that
will serve as the legislature. In any case, according to the agreement has been
realized on 5rd April 1961.
Based on NNG Govt. Official Gazette No. 6B 1961 (National Flag or
the National Flag) and other attributes have been set or announced on December
1rd,
1961.
Hearing formation preparation of the
State and other attributes of this announcement, the President of Indonesia (Ir.
Sukarno) campaign and made a speech on December 19rd, 1961 at the North
Square Jogyakarta, to reclaim the West Papua into the lap of the Homeland
through the invasion. This has been proven by the Sukarno ancient political
maneuver out under the pretext of UN membership and the purchase of weapons
from Russia, as new countries friendly relations. Finally Sukarno had the
support of the United States and the United Nations, with the negotiations and
made a number of agreements, which include New York Agreement on 15rd Agustua 1962
and Rome Agreement.
c. Joseph Luns conection
(Relations with Foreign Minister Joseph Luns-Holland)
Joseph Luns, Dutch Foreign Minister with free misleading knowledge
of the Dutch Parliament in 1950 told them that have the guarantee of an
agreement with US Secretary of State, John F. Dulles, United Nations guarantees
to support the Netherlands in even debated armed
conflict over West Papua (such as Dr. Paulrain own interview in 1981 in
Brussels, Belgium).
Ventured negotiations in 1962 that led the Government, Luns instructed to the representatives of the Netherlands,
Van Royen, assist in the achievement of the right to Self-Determination for the
people of Papua that Van Royen refused and talk with LUNs again on this matter.
In this case the Minister Lins believes that the United States will
help them in the political conflict over West Papua, between the Netherlands
and Indonesia. Hope and trust this turned reverse direction, then in the
negotiations is precisely the United States supported Indonesia and ignore the
promise and hope of the Netherlands. Dutch weak in terms of maintaining Papua
to provide full independence in accordance promises previous Dutch, pursuant to
resolution 1514 (XV) of the United Nations on De-colonization.
It turned out that the Netherlands failed to realize the Right to
Self-determination for the people of Papua, in the western part of the island
of New Guinea. It is a fact that can not be denied.
7
PART THIRD
The Implemendation of the Rights of Indigenous People of West Papua
A. Independence Preparation For West Papuan Indigenous People
Based on the Basis of the Positive Law of the Right to
Self-Determination itself in territories ungoverned, who lived under the
control of the States colonizers, corresponding declarations and treaties
International, as can be explained in part I, II, on
"Historical Flashback of West Papua", then Right to
Self-Determination for Indigenous Peoples of West Papua questioned. Why?
Because, in fact Rights of Indigenous people of West Papua completely violated.
For This right is guaranteed by international human rights laws, according as
resolution 1514 (XV) of the UN General Assembly.
The Netherlands has prepared carefully for the establishment of a
State, as can be explained in part One points
C or above. Please see and study it carefully and efectivecally.
Another basic Dutch prepare for the State of West Papua is: It turns
out that the area of West Papua since 1828 until 1963 has been dominated by
the Kingdom of the Netherlands. And from 1945 to 1963 West Papua was prepared by
the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to become a separate state,
with the name of the country of Papua, according speeches Queen Juliana (the
Netherlands) on 20rd September 1960.
In her speech, Queen Juliana declared and announced that the Dutch
government will give the right to self-determination (Merdeka) on the Nation
and the People Nederlands New Guinea. For the preparation of the Kingdom of the
Netherlands did, among others, founded an academy Government, formed Papua Battalion and Papua flag inaugurated. How can West
Papua prepared to become a State, by the Government of the Netherlands can be
described in this section. Let's look!
First,
the establishment of the National Committee, Flag and Anthems. On September 26rd, 1961, the
Dutch Foreign Minister (Joseph LUNs) gave a speech at the United Nations that the
internationalization of Dutch Papua should be fast. On 19rd Octobert 1961, a number
of citizens of Papua meeting.
The main agenda is the establishment of the Papua Council (New
Guinea Raad) in 1961 On 5rd April 1961, the opening of the Papua Council by Minister Toxopeus
that in damping by Bot.
Second, a debate has started in the General Assembly of the United
Nations. In the UN General Assembly in 1960, Soebandrio come with satirical
notes about the closet State Puppet Papua. It was not received well by the
people of Papua.
Third,
On 21rd Octobert 1961, the first meeting. The main agenda of this meeting
is the Symbol Celection and decision-Coat, which will have to indicate the identity
of the State and the nation of Papua Netherlands.
What is intended is:
"Flag, Shield Emblem, National Anthem, the State and the motto.
Each can be explained as follows:
- Flags: Morning Star;
- Coat: Birds Mambruk;
- Anthem: O my land Papua (this song was composed in 1923, by Zending
missionaries I.S. Kinje);
- Name of Country: New Guinea Nederlands;
- Motto: Diversity in Unity;
- Language: ......?
Furthermore, the National Committee submitted to the Council of
Papua on the initiative of 10 member associations, in an extraordinary meeting
on June 30rd, 1961. Revenue Octobert flag indicates aspiration of people of
Papua to become an independent nation, but that day it was in the hoist, not
happened the day of parting with the Netherlands.
Source: Chapter 11, Blues Papua, Papua Council and Parties. (Hal:
563-572. Books of , P.J Drooglever-An Act of Free Choice in West Papua) .1
- DP: Dewan Papua (New Guinea Raad)
- KNP: Papua National Committee
- DVP: Parties Manokwari
- Parna: Party favor Indonesia in Manokwari
- Animba: Political Parties in Merauke
Characters in the Council and Political Parties:
1. Eliezer J. Bonay
2. Marthen Indey (can be educated in Ambon, it is understood that in contrast to
Nicolas Jouwe).
3. B.T.J. Jufuway
4. Nicolas Jouwe
5. Frans Kaisepo
6. Tanggama Torey
7. Womsiwor
8. Abdulah Arfan
9. Frits Kirihio
10. Herman Wajoy
11. Amos Indey
12. Rumasewu 1960
13. Silas Papare (A Papuans living in Indonesia, which is active in
various campaigns of Irian in Indonesia).
On 18rd November 1961, after an extraordinary meeting of the Council, rules
regarding the flag and the national anthem in accordance with what the High
Council of Nobility (Hoge Raad van Adel) in Den Haag, The Netherlands set by
"Platteel" in the ordinances.
As planned, the flag was held on December 1rd, 1961 at Hollandia and
at all underafdeling. everywhere it has happened in wisdom and
quiet atmosphere, and attended by the local authorities. (Page: 575 Books of
Prof. P.J. Drooglever).
In this period many members of the group-Infiltrations driven by
infiltrators from Ambon, Key and Java, which has been an employee of the Dutch
government in West Papua. The infiltrators group makes a lot of organizations that work under the ground
(Confidential), which in principle West Irian campaign, which is associated
with Indonesia.
For example:
Youth Organization Irian (OPI), Movements Irian Barat (grib), the
Month in May 1962 reported that there is the establishment of one more
organization, namely, Pemoeda Soekarela Indonesia (PSI) 70 infiltrators and the local
Papuans who have been successfully brainwashed by Inflitrans of Ambon and
Java earlier. Within the organization the Key plays an important role.
Definition of infiltrators is:
The group of people who are assigned by the State, which became Civil
Servants or any such private employment, Teachers, Mediacal Work employed ,
Beadle and others, on the pretext that we are both Christians and with other
pretext. Infiltrators group is spying the invaders, for the purpose of conducting
espionage and brainwash on the people of other nationalities who live under
occupation.
Notes:
This has been proven in Papua and is have
witnessed. Therefore, do not believe Pastors, Teachers, Civil Servants,
church officers and private of Malays who infiltrated and infiltration in
Papua, the Papuan Indigenous people. (page: 580-586, Books of Prof. P.J. Drooglever).
In the establishment of Political Parties in Papua, the Muju and
Merauke for one another Party that is, Volkspartij Voor Vrijbeden Rech
(People's Party for Freedom and Justice), who was establishment on May 14rd, 1962. The
leader: Johanis Tamberan (Founder).
Finally, on May 25rd, 1962 Members of the Papua Regional Council
joined with the leadership of VVR-PRKK form a group action is, "FINALLY
DETERMINE OWN FATE". The main desire is to collect all the infiltrators Indonesia and
prosecute them.
The area is represented in the Council of Papua by Caleb Gebze. For
Enarotali region and lakes Wisel representative is, "Willem
Songgonau", one of the Ekari-Moni who is studying in the School Teachers
in Hollandia, has been a member of the Papua National Committee there. A sort of
political organization, in the broad Balim Valley was not there. It is caused
by the influx of Westerners still in the earliest stage. (Page: 587-Books of Prof. P.J.
Drooglever).
Immediately after the debate, the Parliament in the Netherlands on
January 6rd, 1962, the National Committee gathered for the third time in
Hollandia. There trying to get a hook (information) on developments in the
Netherlands.
Papuans agreed with the Dutch intention to resume negotiations with
Indonesia, but with the requirement that the deputy of the Papua People should
participate in it with one's own delegation. (Page: 589-Books of Prof. P.J.
Drooglever).
In the following weeks, talks will be asked on the Right to
Self-Determination took place, and a variety of desires in the department-section in
talking. On February 7rd, 1962, the draft reply has been completed. The answer was sent to
Bot in The Hague, Netherlands, which it gets a chance to leave a comment.
The document is opened by discussing the claims of Indonesia, as
pronounced by Soebandrio in the last meeting of the UN General Assembly. Soebandrio
said: Establishment of Indonesia that Papua is already included in the
proclamation of August 17rd, 1945. Once again rejected, on the grounds that other Papua from
Java, when it was liberated by the Allies (USA-Europe).
Right to Self-Determination exist on the local population, and the
duty to educate the people of Papua entrusted to the Government of the
Netherlands as a Member of the United Nations.
From the above description shows that Indonesia's claim is unfounded
and does not have the power of law, then all the thoughts and actions of
Indonesia over West Papua is a criminal act with the character of a thief of
high interest prostitution. 2
B. Treaty (New York
Agreement August 15th 1962) and West Papua Administration
Submission To UNTEA
a. The influx UNTEA
In Jakarta Fingertips
As has been described earlier in the general description above moods
among indigenous peoples during the last
years of Dutch rule. This, the Dutch Government holdthat
can still retain the negotiations in the interests of the people of Papua. But
among the inhabitants of the Netherlands in Den Haag, the uncertainty of the
island's population bigger.
That is, the majority of the population of the Netherlands in Den
Haag dubious negotiations between the Netherlands and Indonesia. Why? Since the
position of the Dutch government is still weak and under pressure from the
United States and the United Nations. Meanwhile, the Papua confidence in the
Dutch government is still dominant.
Therefore, the picture is different, depending on the position and
expectations of the observer. With regard to this situation, on his visit in
November 1961, the Australian journalist who introduced well by "Peter Hasting" which sketched a picture of a
fairly bleak.
As with the diplomat "Parcival", which stopped after a
couple of months later in Papua. He connotes that although more and more women and
children Netherlands go to the Netherlands from Papua, but the Dutchman high
moral and spirit, and that works continue as a rule.
That is, the Dutch remain faithful to the work in the development in
Papua. But to indigenous Papuans increasingly anti of Indonesian, because of the
pressure and terror of political maneuvers and actions at the end of 1962.
Furthermore, "Precival" like many Australians own visiting
Papua, touched by the friendly relationships between the people of Papua and
the Netherlands.
Delivery PKF (United Nations Security Force), 1,500 people who had
been sent by U'Than (Secretary General), the United Nations, eighteen adviser
or military observers who came from six countries to begin the implementation
of weapons cessation.
Even if UN troops already in Papua, but the Indonesian Army
operations will continue.
UN troops were powerless to control the Indonesian military
aggression. This is evident from the report Reeser, after his visiting at
Hollandia on 18th August 1962. (page: 613-615, Books
of Prof. P.J.
Drooglever).
b. Other UN members involved in security in Papua are:
1. Dr. Djalal Abdoh-Persian diplomat to the United Nations
2. Jose Rolz Bennett-Acting Chief of UN office
3. Platteel-Dutch
4. H. Veldkam-Dutch
They are as administrator, in the implementation of the UN mission
in Papua in the years 1962-1963. Very complicated question is how to treat the
Papuan flag. From the Netherlands has stated that this is not a cause for
concern, because according to the New York agreement under UNTEA Government all
legislation be retained.
Procurement of the flag of the country is one thereof. However,
Bennett from the beginning to explain that in New York the deal is not reported
on the flag of the sort, and that the UN does not want it.
Officer liaison officers who are placed in the UNTEA Government,
Goedhardt-Dutch diplomat and Sudjarwo-Indonesia.
UNTEA Members in Papua early stages of 170 people. The entry of
employees and the Indonesian People's. Army also did not go according to plan.
Meanwhile, an agreement in Middleburgh agreed that massive Strength may occur
after the end of the first phase of UNTEA.
c. Birth of an agreement or New York agreements on August 15th, 1962
Interpreter Negotiation:
1. Soebandrio-Indonesia
2. Adam Malik-Indonesia
3. Van Royen-Dutch
4. Bunker-Ambasator American (mediator)
5. U'Than-UN Secretary General
d. Fill in the New York Agreement of August 15th, 1962
Basically it can be set on the steps taken in the process of
implementation of the Self-Determination in West Papua, which affirm on the Rights of Freedom of the Papuan Indigenous
peoples of west Papua in conducting the referendum.
These rights include:
Right to Freedom of Assembly, the Right to Organize, Right of Speech, Right
to Freedom of Choice and the Rights of others in facing a referendum in 1969 in
West Papua, based on Article 1 Paragraph 1, 2, and Paragraph 3 "The
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". Referring to these
basic of the International human rights law,which the
right to Self-Determination shall be inviolable.
New York Agreement is based, long negotiations between the Dutch
Government and the Government of Republic of Indonesia. Papua nation representative were
excluded. This is a big mistake by the United Nations, the United States, the
Netherlands and Indonesia. Why? Because, according to the Law Papua Nation
Rights has indeed been violated by the
three interest groups over West Papua. Therefore, all parties involved to take
immediate effective steps to resolve the issues of West Papua as a whole
and final.3
Message:
(More can obtain Book of Rev. Socratez Sofyan Yoman, entitled 1969 in Papua Bara Undemocratic and Disability in Laws and Morals).
(More can obtain Book of Rev. Socratez Sofyan Yoman, entitled 1969 in Papua Bara Undemocratic and Disability in Laws and Morals).
C. Successor agreement
(Rome Agreement)
Promised is also not much different with the Treaty of New York,
where the birth of a treaty before facing referendum in West Papua, based
negotiations to negotiations between the Dutch Government and the Government of
Indonesia for rights Management and Development in West Papua.
This agreement is a controversy with the New York agreement, since
the Roma agreement can distort the New York
agreement and legitimizing to
Indonesia unilaterally legalize themselves entered in
West Papua to kill and steal in a way robbing.
It has been proven and is running on and faced by the nation in the
western part of the island of Papua New Guinea, from as early on May 1th, 1963 until
now.
Thus, all manipulations, engineered through this dirty political
maneuvering soon be reopened according to the procedure of the United Nations,
as usually resolve a political conflict in every region, under the supervision
of United Nations.4
D. West Papua Administration submission to the
Government of the Republic of Indonesia by UNTEA (UN)
Finally, on May 1th, 1963, to transfer or surrender UNTEA Administration of West Papua
to the Indonesian government and UNTEA authorities
first phase has ended.
Administration of UNTEA handover to Indonesia on May 1th, 1963 is a
mistaked vatal of the United Nations. Why? Because, should UNTEA keep a
handle on Government Administration in West Papua through the implementation of
the Act of Free Choice in 1969. However, due to the UNTEA administrative handed
West Papua to the Indonesian government, the Indonesian assume that they have
the sole right and authority over West Papua. With a basic understanding of
this narrow, the Indonesian Government has taken action Military AGGRESSION his
brutal and cruel, against those Indigenous Papuans.
For more details, about Indonesian military aggression in Papua can
be explained in the next section of the letter or next section below. The
reader is given an opportunity, in order to study it carefully and very efectively. 5
PART FOUR
Due to Errors of
United Nations of Papuan Rights Breached By Indonesian
A. The Indonesian military invasion in Western
Papua the islands of New Guinea
With the delivery of West Papua Government Administration by UNTEA to the
Government of the Republic of Indonesia on May 1th, 1963, was legitimacy
Indonesia has been able to legalize themselves on all actions within its
Military actions in all over
the West Papua territory.
The Indonesian military actions in question, has been able to do from the date of
May 1th, 1963 until 1969, where the end of PEPERA (An Act of Free Choice) were to manipulation with Full TERROR and INTIMIDATIONS. The Indonesian military aggressioned and the Police of the
indigenous peoples of West Papua, still exists and continues until now. This is
a fact and a reality in the life of the nation in the western part of the
island of Papua New Guinea.
To prove it, please follow Recognition Letgen Ret Sintong Pamjaitan
in his book entitled "Journey A Soldiers
THE COMMAND" below. Please refer!
"Trip A Soldier THE COMMAND" on pages 145-187 of incidents
of violations of human rights of the people of West Papua. In his (Sintong) review clearly
that 1969 can be won through operations, namely combat Operations, territorial operations and authority operations that aims to killed, terrorized, and has Intimidatiosn and its firs to the people of Free Papua
pro.
 | |||
| Sintong Panjaitan is one of the perpetrators of Genocide in West Papua 1963-1969 |
These human rights violations with the agenda "CombatT OPERATIONS IN WEST (Irian)" by the (Special
Forces) of Indonesian in 1965 at the head of Bird Manokwari Papua;
TERRITORIAL OPERATING IN DETERMINING THE OPINION OF THE WEST Irian with
operation "KARSAYWDA Autority" which aims
to win the An Act of Free Choice
in 1969 through terrors, intimidations and murders, kidnappings of Papuans are
suspected.
With the recognition Facts
Sintong above, it is clear that the people of Papua have been and are becoming
victims of violations of Human Rights, andAn Act of Free Choice in 1969 is an true Engineering
Indonesian military as Lt. Sintong Recognition of this.
Sintong was the Commander of Field Operations In 1965-1969, before
and after the implementation of PEPERA in 1969 in West Papua Territory. Sintong also
are perpetrators and witnesses of the events of human rights violations against
to the
people of West Papua on the island of New Guinea. Please visit, Sintong Panjaitan a Preperator of Genocide in West Papua photos
 | |
| Sintong Panjaitan Statements on 2009 |
B. Implementation of An Act of Free Choice (Self-Determination) 1969 in West Papua by the Indonesian Government Under Control UN
Finally, Self-Determination in West Papua has been implemented by
the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on July 19th 1969 to 4th August 1969,
which started from Merauke to Sorong and ends at Hollandia, West Papua.
Implementation of An Act of Free Choice in 1969 in West Papua is not
in accordance with the New York Agreement on 15th August, 1962, and are also
not based on international practices appropriate mechanisms of the United
Nations, where lasim used in Self-Determination for the colonys, under the rules
and prinsiples basis of the International human rights Laws and the mechanisms of
the United Nations.
Implementation of An Act of Free Choice 1969 in West Papua is the
Indonesian way, namely, consultative meeting which was never implemented by the
United Nations in any states on earth. This is was illegal action, that is essentially a CRIME
AGAINST HUMANITY.
C. The Papua Nation Protested over the implementation of An Act of Free Choice 1969
in West Papua
Thus, the
implementation of An Act of
Free Choice 1969 in West Papua by the Indonesian government
can not be justified by anyone and from anywhere on the Laws of the World.
That is why, the
nation of Papua in the western part of the island of New Guinea has a strong
protest and are struggling continue to receive the Right to Self-Determination
itself based Legal Procedure, which normaly used by the United Nations in dealing with
the conflict areas, which is an areas of Colonies countries can be political
disputes.
D. Member States of
the United Nations Protest on the Implementation of An Act of Free Choice 1969 in Papua in the United Nations General Assembly
On November 3th, 1969, the results for An Act
of Free Choice 1969 in West Papua has been reported
officially by the two parties. The first is the report by the Representative of
the Government of the Republic of Indonesia, represented by Soebandrio. And
Reports by Second Party is the UN envoy, which was represented by Dr. Fernandez
Ordiz San.
After hearing statements from both sides, the Countries of Africa
and the Caribbean, led by Ghana and Gabon have been able to filing an objection
to the report, the results of implementation of An Act of Free Choice
1969 in West Papua.
This can happened because it is considered that the implementation of An Act of Free Choice 1969 in Papua problematic, and also methods of implementation are
not based on the mechanism of the United Nations.
Then African States and Caribian apply for a delay of two weeks to
study or learn the Document in question. Why? Since this report takes a
considerable time to be learned, then be filed in the Advanced Session.
Finally, the United Nations General Assembly accepted the proposal by Channa and
Cabon then trial was postponed for two weeks, starting from the date of 4th November 1969.
Furthermore, the United Nations General Assembly Session reopen on
November 19th, 1969, with the agenda to listened to draft proposals from
States parties protest and also by Indonesia and the Netherlands.
Then, the States parties to protest, submitted a draft resolution
that the referendum should and must be held in West Papua in 1975, on the
basis of a rational reason. Why? Because after studying the report of Indonesia
and the United Nations envoy for the implementation of An Act of Free Choice 1969
in West Papua, shows that the results of PEPERA illegitimate and violates the
International procedures and consultative meeting is a unique way and can not
be accepted by common sense.
After hearing the draft proposal of the States Parties to the
protests, further whetting for Indonesia and the Netherlands. Finally, the
Netherlands and Indonesia submit draft proposals together that they are ready
to build Papua, with the agreement that Indonesia is ready to implement the
development and building of Papua, which is mainly in the fields of education,
health and economy and improve the welfare of local residents, and the
Netherlands is ready to give an injection Grant sake the realization of all
programs included in the draft proposal.
Thus the UN General Assembly with a very careful and meticulous,
announces that it received the esteemed Assembly a draft proposal of the Dutch
Government and the Government of Indonesia.
Why draft proposal by Indonesia and the Netherlands can be received
by the UN General Assembly?
Because indeed, Indonesia and the Netherlands backed up fully by the
United States and the United Nations. It is a dirty political maneuvering over
the interests of the American Economy and Indonesia in West Papua, where the
expense of the people of West Papua Political Rights to Self-Determination, and
stands as a fully independent nation.
Based on the draft proposal by Indonesia and the Netherlands, the
General Assembly of the United Nations has noted with Resolution 2504.
Remember, that this Resolution is not an Endorsement results for An Act of Free Choice 1969, but only as a note (TAKE NOTEs), to complete the
procedures annual session of the United Nations.
All of this is evident from United Nations Archive stored at the Central Office
of the United Nations in New York, the United States, which could have been
examined carefully and professionally by Dr. John Salfor ( Britis Academic) and can
also be strengthened from the book by Prof. P.J. Drooglever (Professor of
Leiden University, The Netherlands), entitled "An Act Of Free Choice in
West Papua".
This is the truth of history that can not be lies by anyone. Therefore,
the parties directly involved in the annexation of West Papua into the
territory of the Republic of Indonesia to take immediate positive steps, to the
settlement of the political status of West Papua completely through the door or
the United Nations as normaly.7
PART FIVE
West Papuan Indigenous People
Rejected of An Act of Free Choice 1969 in Papua and Countinue to Struggle for
the right to Self Determination
A. Protested and Papua
Nation Struggle in Western Part of the
Islands of New Giunea on Attendance Indonesia
Protest and anti
Indonesia has crystallized in the minds and souls of conscience Indigenous
people of West Papua, from the Soebandrio speech at the United Nations in the
1960s until now.
Thus, the people
of West Papua, increasingly, fighting for the Right Essentially, namely, Full
Independence Through legal mechanisms of the United-Nations, as can be done to
other nations on Earth.
What is intended
is:
Right to
Self-Determination through a democratic referendum and dignity, based on
international laws in accordance mechanisms of the United Nations.8
B. Papuans Resistance Demanding For Violations of the
Right to Self-Determination
Based on the background described from letters A to N in the above,
the Papuan people know for sure that Their rights have been violated.
Thus, the people of West Papua on the island of New Guinea has been
and is struggling with the tooth, to acquire basic human rights, namely,
self-determination.
End solution is Free West Papua should and
must be full, as other nations that ruled on earth.
Therefore, the other nations that shelter under the umbrella of the
United Nations must be respect
the rights of the Papuan people in the western part of the island of New
Guinea.
These rights include, Right to Self-Determination based on
international laws, among others:
1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights), which has been accepted
and legalized in the Session of United Nations General Assembly on December 10th, 1948;
2. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which
has been accepted and legalized on December 16th, 1966;
3. The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to the Colonials Territories and
Peoples with Resolution A / RES / 1514
(XV), which has been accepted and validated on December 14th, 1960;
4. As well as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, which is received and legalized on September 13th, 2007.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
is further strengthening and remains binding laws for all international
laws,
relating to Human Rights as may be described above.
Thus, the Human Rights shall be respected and should not deprive or
violate the right of every person. States parties that participated in the
signing of the International Agreement, shall protect the rights of every
person under its jurisdiction. Indonesia is one of the countries that signed
the Declaration and all the covenants and International conventions, Indonesia
is obliged to have to protect and enforce all instruments of Human Rights. 9
PART SIX
The Papua Nation Being and Still Suffering Cause of
United Nation Mistaked
A. The Papua conflict
Prolonged Due to Errors Procedure the annexation of West Papua Into Indonesia
Region
The Papua
conflict Prolonged Due to Errors Procedure Into the annexation of West Papua Indonesia
Region are as follows:
First, the Treaty of New York August 15, 1961 which never involve Papuan people as subjects in this agreement;
Second, Indonesia and the United Nations were never implemented the agreement New Yok August 15, 1062, where there are important provisions which accommodated the rights of Papua aslio can not be applied in the process of implementation of the 1969 Act of Free Choice in West Papua.
The important point of Article 18 of the New York Ageement is '' self-determination carried out in accordance with international practice ''. Article 18 d complete citation is as follows:
'' The fulfillment of the requirements of all adults, men and women, not foreign nationals, to participate in self-determination carried out in accordance with international practice, which is also a resident at the time of the signing of this Agreement and at the time of self-determination, including the residents who left after 1945 and returned to the region to resume residence after the end of the Dutch government ''
B. Questions and Answers About the New York Agreement as follows:
First question:
Why the Agreement Article 2 set handover of Papua to UNTEA (UN) and the rest of UNTEA (UN) handed over to Indonesia?
Answer:
On October 1, 1961 the Government of the Netherlands to surrender territory of Papua to UNTEA (PBB), and then (UNTEA) control of Papua only for 6 months starting from April 1, 1962 and ending May 1, 1963. On May 1, 1963 is the submission of the West Papua region official to Indonesia by the United Nations at the time.
"What needs to be highlighted to answer this section is UNTEA as international institutions should continue to be in Papua through the implementation of self-determination of the people of Papua. But, what happens is the delivery of Papua formally into Indonesian rule without the procedure of self-determination".
Second question:
Why the Agreement Article 17 stipulated that the implementation of the 1969
Responsibility is Indonesia?
Answer:
Implementation of 1969 in West Papua is simply a theatrical attempt by the United Nations, the Government of Indonesia and the Netherlands. Therefore, the Government of Indonesia was responsible for carrying out 1969 as a business formality. In fact is already diserakan region of West Papua formally launched on May 1st 1963 by UNTEA (UN) in accordance with the Treaty of New York August 15, 1962. It is a political conspiracy International melecekan and betrayed the rights and dignity of the people of Papua.
Third question:
Megapa Agreement Article 18-d is not carried out in accordance with international practice?
Answer:
Treaty Article 18-d is not carried out in accordance with peraktek Inernasional for two fundamental reasons. First, Papua has been handed over to Indonesia formally by the UN, US, Netherlands, through this Agreement and manifested on May 1, 1963. Second, consensual Italy, Rome, 20 s / d May 21, 1969 between the Dutch Foreign Minister J.M.A.H. Luns, Netherlands Minister for Development Assistance B.J. Undink, and Indonesian Foreign Minister Adam Malik. The sound of the deal being is' 'Indonesian Foreign Minister reiterated the position of the Government of Indonesia concerning freedom Choosing namely that given the practical considerations and technical partimbangan the Indonesian system' 'Meeting' 'is the best way ...' '38
The question as fourth question:
Why the Agreement Article 21 stipulated that the results of self-determination of the Papuans only reported by Indonesia and the United Nations to the Secretary-General to report in the UN General Assembly?
Answer:
If the UN, the US, the Netherlands and Indonesia, really think about the future of the people of Papua, a wise and important step to be taken is:
First, UNTEA not have to submit Papua to Indonesia on May 1, 1963, but should have control of Papua UNTEA to complete the implementation of self-determination for the people of Papua.
Second, Indonesia warring parties with the Netherlands on the political status of West Papua, should not be involved in the implementation of self-determination of the Papuans.
Third, the Indonesian government should not be permitted to apply the laws and regulations of the Indonesian national as well as putting troops Armed Forces of Indonesia in West Papua, before Papuans declared choice political will join Indonesia or stand alone as a sovereign nation based on the determination self.
Question Five:
Why UNTEA and Indonesia Not Implement It Really-Really About Security Treaty Article 22 Security and Freedom Papuans?
Answer:
It is obvious that the UN, America, Holland, Indonesia, do not think about security and freedom of the people of Papua on the ground and their own country. The main goal of America, Indonesia is a natural resources in West Papua. Thus, the problem of security guarantees and freedoms of the people of West Papua is not American affairs, the United Nations, and Indonesia. Treaty Article 22 merely as an attempt to bring the pressure of the international community of some UN member states will discuss the results of the engineering report 1969 which was held in West Papua.
Agreements New York August 15, 1962 comprising of 29 chapters, the fate of the pro-Papua Merdeka is not regulated in any one chapter. New York agreement arising from Article 29 that harass human rights Papuan pro-independence.
The sixth questions:
'' In New York Agreement of August 15, 1962 was not discussed and determined in one chapter was about the fate of the people of Papua, which holds strong to Merdeka in his homeland. Whether in the Articles of Agreement of New York there is implied about the interests of the Papuan People's pro-Merdeka?
Answer:
New York very mangabaikan treaty rights of the Papuan People's pro-independence. Abandonment fate of pro-Papua Merdeka in New York Agreement is a violation of people's rights and Papuan pro-independence.
C. Explanation About the New York Agreement of August 15th, 1962
If the Agreement New York August 15, 1962 honestly formulated to self-determination (Self-Determination) to use international practice, means that the rights of every person Papua deserve major attention which includes the pro-independence. Papuans anti Indonesia can be said to be 99% of the time. Instead, pro-Indonesia are some groups that dikalang by Indonesia most people who come from the Indo-Dutch, Java, Manado, Makassar, Buton, Bugis, and Ambon, mostly non-Papuans living in Manokwari and Hollandia (Jayapura).
Not talking about the fate of the pro-Papua Merdeka in Article 29 Agreements New York New York is because the agreement was only the nation's political and economic interests of the United States and Indonesia with the aim of mastering the natural resources in Papua Barat.
Siding with the New York Agreement for Indonesia is very prominent in New York the entire contents of the Agreement itself. New York agreement is said to self-determination of the People of West Papua, but really only as an instrument of the International chasing, catching, slaughtering, raping, torturing, imprisoning and killing all the inhabitants of West Papua.
'' According to the analysis Rakyat Papua, New York Agreement is the beginning of arrests, massacres, rape, torture, imprisonment, murder, and oppression penjaraan rights of West Papuans.
The entire contents of the Agreement the formulation of New York as a fatal error committed by the United States, Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United Nations. There is no legal basis that justifies that an area that is still disputed by the two countries, one of the countries in dispute are allowed to apply the rules in the area in dispute. Mentioned clauses relating to the transfer of authority from UNTEA to Indonesia as a historical distortion by Indonesia, the Netherlands, the United States and the United Nations in the process of making the New York Agreement.
Placement of Indonesia in Papua since May 1, 1963 administratively is a mistake and the biggest mistake in the history of the nation and state in the world. '
It said mistakes and the biggest mistake, because the People's Rights and the West Papuans who is black and curly hair clumps Melanesia God established on earth Papua are harassed and insulted.
The rights and freedom of the Papuan People really are not guaranteed, even if the rights of freedom it is set as contained in Article XIV which states: ... that they (Indonesia) are consistent with the rights and freedoms guaranteed to the population under the terms -persyaratan this Agreement.
Agreement of New York's most obvious about rights guarantees freedom of movement and assembly of the People and the West Papuans are set: '' UNTEA and Indonesia are guaranteed full rights, including the rights of freedom of speech, freedom of movement and assembly, for area residents ,
But the people and the freedom of West Papuans set out in the New York Agreement is actually seized, betrayed by the government of Indonesia with the Decree of the President Ir official. Soekarno numbered: 8 / May / 1963, which states:
'' Prohibiting / blocking on the rise of the branches of the New Party in West Irian. In the area of West Irian prohibited political activities in the form of a common, public meetings, demonstrations, printing publications, announcements, distribution, trade or articles, showy general, images or photographs without the permission of the first of the governor or the acting official appointed by the President.
Decree (SK) Ir. Sukarno, who quoted above is an integral part and parcel of terror, intervention, intimidation and engineering Government of Indonesia to the People of West Papuans. The Indonesian government completely ignores the humanitarian values and justice as enshrined in the national ideology of Pancasila as Indonesia and the Act of 1945.
Having outlined some Articles of Agreement of New York August 15, 1962 the above, need to be described by two important questions, including: (1) Why did the New York Agreement in 1962 made 15 Agustu? (2) What is the Purpose of the Agreement New York August 15, 1962?
First, the Treaty of New York August 15, 1961 which never involve Papuan people as subjects in this agreement;
Second, Indonesia and the United Nations were never implemented the agreement New Yok August 15, 1062, where there are important provisions which accommodated the rights of Papua aslio can not be applied in the process of implementation of the 1969 Act of Free Choice in West Papua.
The important point of Article 18 of the New York Ageement is '' self-determination carried out in accordance with international practice ''. Article 18 d complete citation is as follows:
'' The fulfillment of the requirements of all adults, men and women, not foreign nationals, to participate in self-determination carried out in accordance with international practice, which is also a resident at the time of the signing of this Agreement and at the time of self-determination, including the residents who left after 1945 and returned to the region to resume residence after the end of the Dutch government ''
B. Questions and Answers About the New York Agreement as follows:
First question:
Why the Agreement Article 2 set handover of Papua to UNTEA (UN) and the rest of UNTEA (UN) handed over to Indonesia?
Answer:
On October 1, 1961 the Government of the Netherlands to surrender territory of Papua to UNTEA (PBB), and then (UNTEA) control of Papua only for 6 months starting from April 1, 1962 and ending May 1, 1963. On May 1, 1963 is the submission of the West Papua region official to Indonesia by the United Nations at the time.
"What needs to be highlighted to answer this section is UNTEA as international institutions should continue to be in Papua through the implementation of self-determination of the people of Papua. But, what happens is the delivery of Papua formally into Indonesian rule without the procedure of self-determination".
Second question:
Why the Agreement Article 17 stipulated that the implementation of the 1969
Responsibility is Indonesia?
Answer:
Implementation of 1969 in West Papua is simply a theatrical attempt by the United Nations, the Government of Indonesia and the Netherlands. Therefore, the Government of Indonesia was responsible for carrying out 1969 as a business formality. In fact is already diserakan region of West Papua formally launched on May 1st 1963 by UNTEA (UN) in accordance with the Treaty of New York August 15, 1962. It is a political conspiracy International melecekan and betrayed the rights and dignity of the people of Papua.
Third question:
Megapa Agreement Article 18-d is not carried out in accordance with international practice?
Answer:
Treaty Article 18-d is not carried out in accordance with peraktek Inernasional for two fundamental reasons. First, Papua has been handed over to Indonesia formally by the UN, US, Netherlands, through this Agreement and manifested on May 1, 1963. Second, consensual Italy, Rome, 20 s / d May 21, 1969 between the Dutch Foreign Minister J.M.A.H. Luns, Netherlands Minister for Development Assistance B.J. Undink, and Indonesian Foreign Minister Adam Malik. The sound of the deal being is' 'Indonesian Foreign Minister reiterated the position of the Government of Indonesia concerning freedom Choosing namely that given the practical considerations and technical partimbangan the Indonesian system' 'Meeting' 'is the best way ...' '38
The question as fourth question:
Why the Agreement Article 21 stipulated that the results of self-determination of the Papuans only reported by Indonesia and the United Nations to the Secretary-General to report in the UN General Assembly?
Answer:
If the UN, the US, the Netherlands and Indonesia, really think about the future of the people of Papua, a wise and important step to be taken is:
First, UNTEA not have to submit Papua to Indonesia on May 1, 1963, but should have control of Papua UNTEA to complete the implementation of self-determination for the people of Papua.
Second, Indonesia warring parties with the Netherlands on the political status of West Papua, should not be involved in the implementation of self-determination of the Papuans.
Third, the Indonesian government should not be permitted to apply the laws and regulations of the Indonesian national as well as putting troops Armed Forces of Indonesia in West Papua, before Papuans declared choice political will join Indonesia or stand alone as a sovereign nation based on the determination self.
Question Five:
Why UNTEA and Indonesia Not Implement It Really-Really About Security Treaty Article 22 Security and Freedom Papuans?
Answer:
It is obvious that the UN, America, Holland, Indonesia, do not think about security and freedom of the people of Papua on the ground and their own country. The main goal of America, Indonesia is a natural resources in West Papua. Thus, the problem of security guarantees and freedoms of the people of West Papua is not American affairs, the United Nations, and Indonesia. Treaty Article 22 merely as an attempt to bring the pressure of the international community of some UN member states will discuss the results of the engineering report 1969 which was held in West Papua.
Agreements New York August 15, 1962 comprising of 29 chapters, the fate of the pro-Papua Merdeka is not regulated in any one chapter. New York agreement arising from Article 29 that harass human rights Papuan pro-independence.
The sixth questions:
'' In New York Agreement of August 15, 1962 was not discussed and determined in one chapter was about the fate of the people of Papua, which holds strong to Merdeka in his homeland. Whether in the Articles of Agreement of New York there is implied about the interests of the Papuan People's pro-Merdeka?
Answer:
New York very mangabaikan treaty rights of the Papuan People's pro-independence. Abandonment fate of pro-Papua Merdeka in New York Agreement is a violation of people's rights and Papuan pro-independence.
C. Explanation About the New York Agreement of August 15th, 1962
If the Agreement New York August 15, 1962 honestly formulated to self-determination (Self-Determination) to use international practice, means that the rights of every person Papua deserve major attention which includes the pro-independence. Papuans anti Indonesia can be said to be 99% of the time. Instead, pro-Indonesia are some groups that dikalang by Indonesia most people who come from the Indo-Dutch, Java, Manado, Makassar, Buton, Bugis, and Ambon, mostly non-Papuans living in Manokwari and Hollandia (Jayapura).
Not talking about the fate of the pro-Papua Merdeka in Article 29 Agreements New York New York is because the agreement was only the nation's political and economic interests of the United States and Indonesia with the aim of mastering the natural resources in Papua Barat.
Siding with the New York Agreement for Indonesia is very prominent in New York the entire contents of the Agreement itself. New York agreement is said to self-determination of the People of West Papua, but really only as an instrument of the International chasing, catching, slaughtering, raping, torturing, imprisoning and killing all the inhabitants of West Papua.
'' According to the analysis Rakyat Papua, New York Agreement is the beginning of arrests, massacres, rape, torture, imprisonment, murder, and oppression penjaraan rights of West Papuans.
The entire contents of the Agreement the formulation of New York as a fatal error committed by the United States, Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United Nations. There is no legal basis that justifies that an area that is still disputed by the two countries, one of the countries in dispute are allowed to apply the rules in the area in dispute. Mentioned clauses relating to the transfer of authority from UNTEA to Indonesia as a historical distortion by Indonesia, the Netherlands, the United States and the United Nations in the process of making the New York Agreement.
Placement of Indonesia in Papua since May 1, 1963 administratively is a mistake and the biggest mistake in the history of the nation and state in the world. '
It said mistakes and the biggest mistake, because the People's Rights and the West Papuans who is black and curly hair clumps Melanesia God established on earth Papua are harassed and insulted.
The rights and freedom of the Papuan People really are not guaranteed, even if the rights of freedom it is set as contained in Article XIV which states: ... that they (Indonesia) are consistent with the rights and freedoms guaranteed to the population under the terms -persyaratan this Agreement.
Agreement of New York's most obvious about rights guarantees freedom of movement and assembly of the People and the West Papuans are set: '' UNTEA and Indonesia are guaranteed full rights, including the rights of freedom of speech, freedom of movement and assembly, for area residents ,
But the people and the freedom of West Papuans set out in the New York Agreement is actually seized, betrayed by the government of Indonesia with the Decree of the President Ir official. Soekarno numbered: 8 / May / 1963, which states:
'' Prohibiting / blocking on the rise of the branches of the New Party in West Irian. In the area of West Irian prohibited political activities in the form of a common, public meetings, demonstrations, printing publications, announcements, distribution, trade or articles, showy general, images or photographs without the permission of the first of the governor or the acting official appointed by the President.
Decree (SK) Ir. Sukarno, who quoted above is an integral part and parcel of terror, intervention, intimidation and engineering Government of Indonesia to the People of West Papuans. The Indonesian government completely ignores the humanitarian values and justice as enshrined in the national ideology of Pancasila as Indonesia and the Act of 1945.
Having outlined some Articles of Agreement of New York August 15, 1962 the above, need to be described by two important questions, including: (1) Why did the New York Agreement in 1962 made 15 Agustu? (2) What is the Purpose of the Agreement New York August 15, 1962?
PART SEVEN
Conclusion
Whereas, New Guinea is a work of creation
of the Almighty when creation him, and put a clump of Melanesian Papuans, the Pacific region.
Then the claims of other men from the planet Earth is not true, because the
historical facts prove that Papua has long existed;
That West Papua is not a child of the islands
or not formed due to the melting of icebergs from the steamer gleser islands of
Java, but West Papua has for centuries silence filled with human-sufficient in
natural resources;
Whereas, The Netherlands intends either to
grant independence to West Papua, but good intentions had been the warted by
the United States and Indonesian on their economic interests;
Whereas, all the way annexation of West
Papua is full manipulated and manipulative, with Dirty Politics maneuvers by
the Government of Republic of Indonesia and the United States;
Whereas, the Indonesian occupation of the
lands of the nation of Papua, in the western part of the islands of New Guinea
is Illegal and the legal basis is strong yet;
Whereas, by proving the fact history shows
that the Right to Self-Determination for residents of indigenous people’s of West Papuans have never
been implemented and Still Valid. The Rights and Democracy will be implemented
according to UN democratic procedure.
PART
EIGHT
General recommendations
The First,
To People's of West Papua and All Struggle Components of Papuan Nations as well as the Western Papua New
Guinea
(1). Whereas, in order to prevent the
extinction of the Papuan people who clump of
Melanesians in West Papua, take immediate and decisive steps are
effective to build unity, which then voiced to the people and Governments
organizations around the world, which mainly Nations Institutions and
humanitarian work:
(2). Whereas, immediately unite and fight to defend the nation of Papuans as Melanesia Ethnic Genocide, disastrous due to the despicable actions of the Government of Indonesia through thier seciruty forces;
(3). Whereas, encouraged that all components of the Indigenous Peoples of Papuans, to show the humility and love each other with full peace amongst the indigenous Papua then telling the truth to other nations in the world.
(2). Whereas, immediately unite and fight to defend the nation of Papuans as Melanesia Ethnic Genocide, disastrous due to the despicable actions of the Government of Indonesia through thier seciruty forces;
(3). Whereas, encouraged that all components of the Indigenous Peoples of Papuans, to show the humility and love each other with full peace amongst the indigenous Papua then telling the truth to other nations in the world.
The Second,
To the Government of the Republic of Indonesia
(1). Whereas, in order to resolve the political conflict between the Indonesian government and Papuan people in West Papua, with dignity and completely, then the Indonesian government to reflect on themselves and it is necessary to admit mistakes, and open themselves to accept the proposed International Dialogue which mediated by the neutral third party.
(2). Whereas, tha together with representatives of the Papuans people elected by the grassroots, seek a solution through peaceful International dialogue, mediated by a neutral third party;
(3). Whereas, opened the widest access to the observer, researcher, working on Human Rights and foreign journalists to visit or allow intering West Papua;
(4). That, respecting and treating indigenous Papuans, as a dignified human being in accordance with international human rights law and national law;
(5). Whereas, to stop all forms of political conspiracy engineered Government of the Republic of Indonesia through repressive security apparatus, which has been and is being done to the people of Papua which has been to started on May 1th 1963 until now. This includes terror, intimidation, persecution, arrest, detention, torture, extrajudicial killings outside the procedure (extra justicial Killed) and disappearances, leading GENOCIDE of West Papuan nation;
(6). Whereas, appreciate and respect the rights of indigenous peoples freedoms of indigenous Papuans to speech, assembly, association, according the International Human Rights Law and the International Covenant on Civil Rights and Political;
(7). That, immediately release all political prisoners of Papuans nation, from all over Indonesina correctional Institution.
(1). Whereas, in order to resolve the political conflict between the Indonesian government and Papuan people in West Papua, with dignity and completely, then the Indonesian government to reflect on themselves and it is necessary to admit mistakes, and open themselves to accept the proposed International Dialogue which mediated by the neutral third party.
(2). Whereas, tha together with representatives of the Papuans people elected by the grassroots, seek a solution through peaceful International dialogue, mediated by a neutral third party;
(3). Whereas, opened the widest access to the observer, researcher, working on Human Rights and foreign journalists to visit or allow intering West Papua;
(4). That, respecting and treating indigenous Papuans, as a dignified human being in accordance with international human rights law and national law;
(5). Whereas, to stop all forms of political conspiracy engineered Government of the Republic of Indonesia through repressive security apparatus, which has been and is being done to the people of Papua which has been to started on May 1th 1963 until now. This includes terror, intimidation, persecution, arrest, detention, torture, extrajudicial killings outside the procedure (extra justicial Killed) and disappearances, leading GENOCIDE of West Papuan nation;
(6). Whereas, appreciate and respect the rights of indigenous peoples freedoms of indigenous Papuans to speech, assembly, association, according the International Human Rights Law and the International Covenant on Civil Rights and Political;
(7). That, immediately release all political prisoners of Papuans nation, from all over Indonesina correctional Institution.
The Third,
The Governments and Parliaments of the World, Institutions of International Humsn Rights Workking, the
United Nations and the International Community.
(1). Whereas, in
order to prevent casualties and stop a violent political conflict between the
Government of the Republic of Indonesia and West Papuan nation, the United
Nations by all Member Governments of the United Nations to immediately open up
the immediately open the democratic space for the people of West Papua, and
further to facilitate International Dialogue, to undertake a reconsideration of
the implementation of Resolution 1969 and to 24 by No. 2504. Why? Because the
resolution is unclear. That is, whether it is the Ratification of 1969 in West Papua or just Represents Notes as acceptance
of the proposal of the Dutch Government and Indonesian in the General Assembly
of the United Nations on December 19th, 1969.
(2.) Whereas, in order that the United Nations (UN), the United States Government, the Netherlands Government and the States who have been involved in the process of annexation of West Papua into the territory of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), from "New York Agreement on August 15th, 1962 which has happened handover Administration of the Government of the Netherlands to the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) and subsequently UNTEA handed the administration of West Papua to the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on May 1th, 1963, then Indonesian to implement the Act of Free Choice (PEPERA) in 1969 at the request of the International accordance deal by Treaty of the New York agreements on August 15th, 1962, but in fact the implementation of 1969 in West Papua problematic and undemocratic and full of terror, intimidation and manipulation pressure repressive by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia security forces (according to the original person Papua); and on the other hand that the 1969 in West Papua is legitimate and has Final (according to the Indonesia); then the parties involved in this open International Dialogue mediated by a neutral third party who then reviewing PEPERA 1969 in West Papua;
(2.) Whereas, in order that the United Nations (UN), the United States Government, the Netherlands Government and the States who have been involved in the process of annexation of West Papua into the territory of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), from "New York Agreement on August 15th, 1962 which has happened handover Administration of the Government of the Netherlands to the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) and subsequently UNTEA handed the administration of West Papua to the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on May 1th, 1963, then Indonesian to implement the Act of Free Choice (PEPERA) in 1969 at the request of the International accordance deal by Treaty of the New York agreements on August 15th, 1962, but in fact the implementation of 1969 in West Papua problematic and undemocratic and full of terror, intimidation and manipulation pressure repressive by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia security forces (according to the original person Papua); and on the other hand that the 1969 in West Papua is legitimate and has Final (according to the Indonesia); then the parties involved in this open International Dialogue mediated by a neutral third party who then reviewing PEPERA 1969 in West Papua;
(3). Whereas, in order that the United Nations (UN) opened democratic space for freedom of Rights, so that the Indigenous Peoples of West Papuans can decide their own future, in accordance with the standards of international human rights law by the Charter of the United Nations Declaration on the signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Politics rights;
(4). That, in order that the State Governments in the world made it clear to the Government of Indonesian to open access for international observers, which is mainly to conduct a thorough investigation of human rights abuses that have been and are being done by the government officials of the Republic of Indonesia against the people of Papua and also allow foreign journalists to access in Papua and International Human Rights Institutions undertook a thorough investigation into human rights violations, which occurred in the lands of West Papuans since 1963 until now.
PART NINE
Advice and
Closures
Thus, Looking
Back Papuan's history is compiled for the sake of learning for all those who do
not understand about the history of Papua, and more particularly for the young
generation in the western part of the islands of Papua New Guinea.
This arrangement
is sort History, therefore, readers are given the opportunity to seek and
obtain Papuan's books history that has
been written by the Papuans themselves, as well as by the Foreign and Indonesian.
We write this is
the Next Generation version of the Papuans struggle, based on the fact that
right from the reference various sources. May be useful for us all. Amen.
Footnotes:
[1] All of the data sources that are equipped with the
historical facts, based on the studies that can be described above shows that
Indonesian's claim to West Papua is unfounded. Indonesian's claim is based on
the relationship with the Kingdom of Islam and claim that the Dutch East Indies
colony, it can not be found in any history sheet. This is a fact and a reality
in people's lives over the centuries.
[2] In the
divisions of West Papua and East Papua this can be done casually by foreigners
who came as invaders, unnoticed by the people of Papua as their rights. These
actions actually violated the human rights of the Papuan Indigenous people, who possessed the lands of Papua.
[3] Dutch in
West Papua is as occupiers, who has been camed
to did colonialism
activities in West Papua
[4] Decolonisasi program was discussed
in the UN General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA), pursuant to Resolution
66 on December 14th, 1946 meanwhile asked the Member States of the
United Nations to immediately give Independence to the Colonial Territories,
which is ungoverned. This request to the target that by the end of 1946 all the
colonies had to get out of its occupation. That is, all the colonies should be
granted independence without exception.
Dutch weak in defending West Papua to provide full
independence Rights, because the Dutch are full of hope to the United States.
But the hope and promise of America agree reversed. It is a fact that can not
be deny by anyone. (Book Works Prof. Pieter Drooglever "An Act of Free
Choice in 1969 WWest Papua).
The End
Writed,
Translated, Edited and Publishing by,
Sebby Sambom
West Papuans Human Rights Defender
(Former West Papuan Political Prisoner)
Alright, I do not understant well about Argentia Latin language. But anyway I will to translate. Thank you.
ReplyDelete